TRYEXPE

I found hundreds of viral AI image commands. Instead of just saving them, I want to test what every one actually does to a photograph. I've been seeing more and more posts claiming that you can use short commands such as: /cinematic /motionblur /topview /goldenhour /anime /bokeh and many others to transform photographs with AI. The idea is simple: Upload a photo → use a shortcut → let the AI transform it. I came across a large collection from G Prompt that describes itself as “200+ Viral Shortcodes for AI Shortcut Prompt Editing.” The page presents these as image-to-image shortcuts for ChatGPT, covering everything from photo repair and background changes to camera angles, lighting, effects, transformations, and social-media-ready edits. I also found another collection of 99 ChatGPT AI image commands covering camera perspectives, lighting, weather, photography styles, artistic styles, environments, materials, and visual effects. That gave me an idea. Instead of collecting these co...

 I found a list of 50 shortcut commands for AI. Instead of just saving them, I want to test what they actually do—and what happens when I combine them. I recently came across an Instagram carousel titled “50 Secret Codes for Claude” by Ritu.designhub . It contains short commands such as: /analyst /critic /optimizer /deepdive /firstprinciples /compare /proscons /stepbystep /roadmap /framework The idea is simple: instead of repeatedly writing instructions like “analyze this deeply” or “find the weaknesses in this idea,” you use a short shortcut to represent that type of instruction. That made me curious. Do these shortcuts actually change the output? And even more interesting: What happens when I combine them? That's what I want to find out. 1. This is an experiment, not a list I'm not making another post that simply says: “Here are 50 amazing AI shortcuts. Go use them.” I don't know yet whether they're amazing. I want to test them . For each shortcut, I'll give th...

  I found a prompting structure behind 12 AI posters. Now I want to see what happens when I actually use it. I've been experimenting with AI image generation for a while, and one thing I've noticed is that getting a good image isn't always about having a better image generator. Sometimes, the biggest difference is how you describe what you want . I recently came across an interesting article from Artea called “The 12 AI poster prompts & the structure behind them.” The article doesn't just show finished AI posters. It explains the structure behind the prompts that were used to create them. The prompts consistently make a large number of visual decisions instead of leaving everything for the image model to invent. That gave me an idea. Instead of simply reading the article and saving the prompting formula, I want to test it myself . The experiment My goal is simple: Take the prompting structure explained in the article, create my own poster concepts with it, and find ...

  An experiment to find out which AI shortcuts actually work for marketers I came across an interesting article containing 200 ChatGPT shortcut commands specifically designed for marketers, content creators, agencies, and business users . At first, I could simply bookmark the article and move on. But I had a different idea. What if I actually tested every single shortcut? Not just read the descriptions. Not just assume they work. I want to use them on real marketing problems, see what ChatGPT produces, compare the results, rate each shortcut, and document everything. And I want to do the experiment publicly. So this is the beginning of my: 200 ChatGPT Marketing Shortcuts Experiment And yes... I'm planning to test them LIVE on YouTube. 1. What am I trying to do? The original article contains 200 custom ChatGPT shortcuts created for marketing and agency workflows. The shortcuts cover areas such as: Content & copywriting Social media & Reels SEO & research Client & bus...